Skip to main content

Reprehensible Valentines

In 1851, shortly after Esther Howland began making Valentines commercially in America, a writer for the Alexandria Gazette opined, "St Valentine’s Day has sadly degenerated in these latter days. The delicate compliments of old times, are superseded by guady[sic] presents, or hideous caricatures. The fashion of 'Valentines' will soon go out of vogue." 

The Daily Dispatch, writing about Valentine's Day four years later, sheds a little more insight on this "playful waggery" tarnishing a holiday for sweethearts. The Valentine industrial complex employed artists to create "caricatures and satirical verses. . . . Some of them are very good—some are abominably vulgar." The writer indicates there have been some reports of cruelty behind sending such Valentines, "but it is to be hoped they are rare, especially with regard to the fair sex. Of the other we need not have so much care, particularly the old bachelors, whom we readily consign to the mercies of all, to be treated as seems best."

'Tis by Your Music, William H. Helfand Comic Valentine Collection, Library Company of Philadelphia.
 The Lynchburg Daily Virginian notes that by 1857, Valentines were trending more toward "illustrated nonsense and tomfoolery" than genuine expressions of love, with an implication it was imported Northern incivility that would never have permeated the genteel Old South: "Comic caricatures were more liberally dispatched than than sentimental order; and found their way to all classes without regard to age, sex or condition. Various were the effects produced upon the recipients of these Yankee inventions. We heard one lady, in her wrath, declare that 'no gentleman would send them,' and an indignant gentleman, boiling over with ire, say, 'I would just like to know who sent one to me.'" Even so, the overall tone of the article took a lighthearted approach - the issue of these "abominable" Valentines was sure to be taken up by the local authorities just as soon "as the Market House or the Local. . . are disposed of."

Propriety Personified, William H. Helfand Comic Valentine Collection, Library Company of Philadelphia.
Despite the dire projection about the impending demise of Valentine Day cards and the endless harping in the newspapers that the practice should be discontinued, twenty years later, these "hideous caricatures" were still a central part of the card experience, judging by the Winchester Times for Feb. 14, 1872: "To-day is St. Valentine’s day. We are reminded of this by noticing in the windows of some of our bookstores the displays of valentines, comic and sentimental. . . . In this country the day is observed only by sending ornamental, illustrative or comic missive to friends and foes alike. The comic kind are frequently sent with a view to exasperate or wound the feelings of enemies. It is a custom to be reprehended, and should not be practiced." The practice was so common, in fact, more than one piece of fiction from the era centered around the experience of receiving a spiteful Valentine and the potential repercussions of the act. (If time permits, we may discuss a story or two before Valentine's Day this year to further illustrate how deeply the practice permeated American culture.)

As late as 1900, the Times was still noting that it was customary to send Valentines of a mean-spirited nature to others, so that almost no one escaped the holiday without getting a card of some sort: "The Valentine has made its appearance, not only the dainty, sentimental ones, breathing love and poetic sweetness, but the absurd caricatures which seem to fascinate the American mind insomuch that very few people fail to receive one on the 14th of February. Some are sent in a spirit of fun, others maliciously."

The tide, however, was turning. In 1909, the Virginia Guide noted "The hideous comic valentine has not been so conspicuous this year, and it is said to be going out of fashion." In Norfolk, at least, the "old-fashioned" Valentines with acidic messages were down to the lingering stock by 1923, and by 1930, the mean-spirited missives had reportedly fallen out of favor altogether (though lighter comic examples still exist after this point).

Despite all the lip service to denounce the tradition of sending anonymous antagonizing cards in the late 19th century, even the articles that criticized the maliciousness of sending a vinegar Valentine conceded, "It is well enough to have a little fun that way, as it makes business for the stationers and postoffices - both very worthy institutions." 

If you're interested in seeing more cards that might have been received from the 1850s to early 1900s, the Library Company of Philadelphia, the source of the two cards shown here, has an extensive collection, with transcriptions of the accompanying captions. The Alice Marshall Women's History Collection at Penn State University Libraries contains later examples of comic valentines, showing the overall softening by the 1920s compared to the earlier examples of the 19th century.

Enjoy these posts?

Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Fratricide in Clarke County: Part Four

If you're just joining us on this long and twisting tale, you can catch up with Part One , Part Two , and Part Three . Today's entry should be our final entry into the saga of the Little family, and it will not have any detailed medical testimony (just in case you're squeamish). To quickly recap where we left off, the first trial for Lycurgus Little was held over two weeks in October of 1873 in Berryville, with Judge Turner presiding. At the end, Lycurgus was deemed guilty of second degree murder. Lycurgus' Sentencing The sentence was proclaimed on the following Saturday, around 3 PM. Lycurgus was said to be pale but composed, "though a few tears were shed." According to the Winchester News : Judge Turner then proceeded to pronounce the sentence of the court, in conformity with the decision of the jury. When the Judge mentioned the term of imprisonment, the prisoner interrupted him by asking. “How long, Judge?" “Fourteen years,” replied the Judge; “bu...

A Fraticide in Clarke County: Part Three

If you're just joining us for the first time, you can catch up on Part One and Part Two before diving in. Since it's been about a month since our last post, let's quickly recap where we are in this story. After initially being on board with a punishment for Oscar and Lycurgus in the death of Clinton, the other Little family members, seemingly spearheaded by Columbus' press tour in Washington D.C., wanted to back off and drop the case. However, the indictment was deemed a "true bill" at the July court session, and the trial was scheduled for the October term. Columbus' press tour caused some feuds between the Richmond Enquirer and the Winchester and Clarke papers, but by the end of the summer, it seemed the press had largely come to acknowledge that the original statement and reporting in the Winchester papers was accurate. The state and the prisoners both secured all-star law teams.  As this section of the story is heavy on medical testimony from the doc...

Eyes of Brown and Blue

After our lengthy visit to Clarke County, it seems fitting to take a short break with some poetry, this time printed in the Staunton Spectator, 29 August 1894 . The poem appears to have been written quite some time before it made its way to Staunton, with the earliest sighting found to date being in 1860 in the New York Saturday Press .  Unfortunately, the author's name has been anonymized with very common initials and a plain last name, and we've been unable to track down this poem printed in another location to help us hone in on the complete name for more in-depth research. This means we've also been unable to find any other examples of this poet's work, so at the end of the day we'll have to consider this still a case of "author unknown" despite being signed. Like our earlier Valentine stories, this poem should be out of copyright in the US, so the entire poem is reprinted here. Enjoy this glimpse of the 19th century! EYES OF BROWN AND BLUE.  Out of ...