Skip to main content

Conrad House Addenda

I was invited to speak at the event unveiling a new historical plaque concerning the Conrad House and the door at the Joint Judicial Center on Friday (part of why the blog has been fairly quiet recently). The presentation will be printed in an upcoming version of the Journal. As usual, I took some questions from the audience at the end of my lecture. That's always a good way to see what I might have overlooked in my first pass through a topic. While I don't know if anyone at the presentation who asked questions will follow up with my blog, here are a few answers to their questions (and others). 

Due to the more recent nature of many of the questions and heavy reliance on the Winchester Star, you may need to have your Handley Regional Library card barcode handy and create a free account at newspaperarchive.com to access the full articles linked here.

The Property Layout:

The property consisted of four lots in total originally: two faced Cameron Street, and two faced Kent Street, with property lines dividing it equally east-west and north-south. When the house was built, it was fairly common for larger homes in Winchester to span multiple lots (essentially they built as they pleased on the two acres they had available). The Kurtz Building lot, carved out later, is not in line today with the original lot configuration, being tighter to the building than the original lot size. The north-south line bisecting the property most likely is in line with the original lot configuration.

1947 Sanborn Map, pre-demolition

Current (2025) property line configuration

The Conrad Family Descendants and Relatives:

From the direct line of Conrads who lived in the house, Bobbie Conrad, the last family member, did not have any children. However, as mentioned in the presentation, most of the early Conrad family generations consisted of multiple children (often around 7-9 surviving to adulthood). The progenitor of the line, Frederick Conrad, had a daughter who married into the Young family (hence "Young" recurring as a middle name multiple times). Daniel Conrad had at least two sons who continued the family line, including Robert Y. Conrad, who had nine children survive, including a daughter who had children with the Fauntleroy surname. Major Holmes had a daughter who married into the Smith family. Some other articles have indicated a marriage of a Conrad family daughter into the Hollis family, as well as relatives living in New York and Georgia. It's very possible branch line descendants are out there, but no longer under the Conrad surname!

Sale Prices:

The original sale of the two acres of the property to H.B. McCormac in 1928 was for $40,000 (about $733,000 in 2024 dollars), and it was purchased by the City of Winchester for $125,000 in 1959 (about $1,347,000 in 2024 dollars). The prices were reported by the Winchester Star on January 15, 1959.

Retail Merchants Associate Fund Match and Referendum:

Ben Belchic of the Winchester-Frederick County Historical Society proposed a citizen referendum on whether the house should be torn down on December 11, 1962. The same article notes the City had no funds allocated at the time for demolition, so the Retail Merchants Association offer of $45,000 if the City would match those funds was likely extremely tempting. A letter to the editor on January 9, 1963, called for the Retail Merchants Association to offer that $45,000 to improve the deplorable and unsafe conditions of the sidewalks before razing the historic house, rather than further endanger shoppers by making them traverse a block to reach the stores.

Tenants in 1969:

The tenants in the six apartments in the Conrad House were given their 60-day notice of lease termination on February 24, 1969, meaning they had to vacate by May 1 of that year. The move was in preparation to begin the process of demolishing the building, though as we know it took about a year to actually see the walls come down. That article quotes a price of $648,000 (around $5,538,000 in 2024 dollars) to demolish the house, level the lot, and install a gate mechanism to create the parking complex.

The Exact Time of Death:

The Winchester Star reported the final wall of the Conrad House fell at 9:44 a.m. on April 28, 1970.

The Two Halves of the Parking Lot:

The lot, which was slated to open for use on July 1, 1970, was described as having "two parts." This refers broadly to the metered versus designated spaces lots, roughly the north-south division along the property line as mentioned in the presentation. The article in the Winchester Star on June 5, 1970, actually described the division as three types of parking: the Cameron Street side was "transient meter parking," intended for short stays, up to three hours per meter. The Boscawen Street side was intended as all-day parking, up to 10 hours on the meter. The final portion, on the Kent Street side adjacent to the bowling alley, was designated for monthly rented spaces. The final tally was expected to be 210 parking spaces.

While I had a good question about the Admiral Byrd House on Amherst, we will save that for a future investigation to give it more space. It is an interesting house that has (so far) not had a significant amount of historical coverage, likely because it was a relatively modern building (especially when compared to the Conrad House) at the time of its demolition.

Enjoy these posts?

Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Fratricide in Clarke County: Part Four

If you're just joining us on this long and twisting tale, you can catch up with Part One , Part Two , and Part Three . Today's entry should be our final entry into the saga of the Little family, and it will not have any detailed medical testimony (just in case you're squeamish). To quickly recap where we left off, the first trial for Lycurgus Little was held over two weeks in October of 1873 in Berryville, with Judge Turner presiding. At the end, Lycurgus was deemed guilty of second degree murder. Lycurgus' Sentencing The sentence was proclaimed on the following Saturday, around 3 PM. Lycurgus was said to be pale but composed, "though a few tears were shed." According to the Winchester News : Judge Turner then proceeded to pronounce the sentence of the court, in conformity with the decision of the jury. When the Judge mentioned the term of imprisonment, the prisoner interrupted him by asking. “How long, Judge?" “Fourteen years,” replied the Judge; “bu...

A Fraticide in Clarke County: Part Three

If you're just joining us for the first time, you can catch up on Part One and Part Two before diving in. Since it's been about a month since our last post, let's quickly recap where we are in this story. After initially being on board with a punishment for Oscar and Lycurgus in the death of Clinton, the other Little family members, seemingly spearheaded by Columbus' press tour in Washington D.C., wanted to back off and drop the case. However, the indictment was deemed a "true bill" at the July court session, and the trial was scheduled for the October term. Columbus' press tour caused some feuds between the Richmond Enquirer and the Winchester and Clarke papers, but by the end of the summer, it seemed the press had largely come to acknowledge that the original statement and reporting in the Winchester papers was accurate. The state and the prisoners both secured all-star law teams.  As this section of the story is heavy on medical testimony from the doc...

Eyes of Brown and Blue

After our lengthy visit to Clarke County, it seems fitting to take a short break with some poetry, this time printed in the Staunton Spectator, 29 August 1894 . The poem appears to have been written quite some time before it made its way to Staunton, with the earliest sighting found to date being in 1860 in the New York Saturday Press .  Unfortunately, the author's name has been anonymized with very common initials and a plain last name, and we've been unable to track down this poem printed in another location to help us hone in on the complete name for more in-depth research. This means we've also been unable to find any other examples of this poet's work, so at the end of the day we'll have to consider this still a case of "author unknown" despite being signed. Like our earlier Valentine stories, this poem should be out of copyright in the US, so the entire poem is reprinted here. Enjoy this glimpse of the 19th century! EYES OF BROWN AND BLUE.  Out of ...