Skip to main content

Ambrotypes, Melianotypes, and Firnotypes, Oh My! Photography after the Civil War

An ad placed in the Winchester News for August 18, 1865 shows Winchester getting back to some semblance of normalcy. One of those signs was Nathaniel Routzahn, a local photographer, noting a reduction in prices for his services to previous costs. His prices before the war? According to an 1859 ad, they ranged anywhere from 50 cents to $50. 

An 1858 invention to display photographs like a slideshow, advanced by the knobs on the top of the cabinet in The American Journal of Photography. The inventor believed "it has numbered the days of the fashionable album."

Suppose you were hankering for a portrait. Mr. Routzahn's company offered several options, so let's take a look to explore what each type of image was:

  • Ambrotypes: This is an image printed on glass, which first proliferated in the United States in the 1850s. While they were cheaper to produce and clearer than the earlier daguerreotype, by the time of this ad, ambrotypes were falling out of favor, in part due to their fragility.
  • Melianotypes: This appears to be another name for tintype photography (and is usually spelled "melanotype" in modern sources). In contrast to the ambrotype, tintypes used a thin metal sheet with a dark lacquer as the base, making them a bit more resilient, and also a bit faster and cheaper to produce. The downside? Tintypes used potassium cyanide as a fixer, making it potentially the most hazardous photography method. Tintypes persisted into the 1930s.
  • Firnotypes: This one may be a complete misspelling, possibly intending "ferrotype" here. This is essentially another kind of tintype, likely with a different proprietary production method.
  • Hallotypes: This appears to be a subset of ambrotypes, still being on glass, but this time involving two pieces of glass and additional color washes. The two pieces of glass are affixed to each other, creating something of a "3D" effect.
  • Card de Visette: Most likely a corruption of the more common term "carte-de-visite, or photographic calling card." These small prints (about 2 1/8" x 3 1/2") were introduced around 1861, and faded by 1905.

An ad taken out the following year introduced the "porcelain" to Routzahn's lineup, which, as you can imagine, consisting of firing the photographic image onto a piece of porcelain. The technique was supposed to be the best "for softness and delicacy of tone, clear complexion and making the features stand out prominent." 

By 1868, Routzahn had relocated to the first floor of the newly-built Masonic Lodge, opposite the Taylor Hotel. It appears from brief newspaper notices that Routzahn took at several tours in the surrounding areas as an itinerant photographer, but always returned to Winchester. He passed away at age 87 in 1908, and is buried in Sacred Heart Cemetery, marked with a stone obelisk.

Sanborn map, 1885, showing the Lodge at building numbered 23. The gallery was in an addition off the back of the first floor. 

If  Routzahn's name seems slightly familiar, you may have heard it in connection with his most famous photograph taken of General "Stonewall" Jackson during the winter of 1861-1862. The story goes that before he sat for the photo in his military uniform, one of his buttons had fallen off. After begging a needle and thread, the button was reattached - though somewhat misaligned, leading to the so-called "crooked button" picture. 

While details about Nathaniel Routzahn are relatively scarce outside his famous image, a profile in the 1883 Winchester Times alludes that he was imprisoned at Fort McHenry during the Civil War for his attempts to obtain chemicals for his photography. After looking through the prisoner records of Fort McHenry, we may be able to confirm this tidbit. On page 290, there is an entry for a Routzahn, first name illegible, who was a citizen. It appears he may have been imprisoned from Dec. 13-31, 1864 at the orders of Major General Sheridan. He was suspected of being a blockade runner, which tracks with the statement in the newspaper.

The chemicals needed for photography are flammable, and collodion can also be used in medical applications. Sheridan's time of military occupation in Winchester was especially harsh, so it is plausible an "innocent" attempt to obtain chemicals could be seen as an attempt to smuggle in restricted goods. If this is indeed our Nathaniel Routzahn, he was released by General Morris, the commander of Fort McHenry.

If the timeline is correct from the article in the Winchester Times, Routzahn arrived in Winchester around 1858 and enjoyed a long career taking portraits at least through the 1870s and likely into the 1880s. More of his work, including the "crooked button" image, can be seen at the Stewart Bell Jr.'s image collection.

For the scholars, you may wish to read more at Photographs from the 19th Century to learn about these different photographic processes and how to identify them, or Photography in a Nut Shell, printed the same year Routzahn set up shop in Winchester.

Enjoy these posts? Support me on Ko-fi.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lord Londonderry and the Radiant Boy

The Alexandria Herald of January 29, 1823 , reprints a ghostly encounter in England between Lord Londonderry and a boy over twenty years earlier. The unnamed mansion of this event is located in the north of Ireland, and the writer claimed everything from the setting to the architecture and furnishings would predispose anyone to start seeing ghosts and other wild apparitions. Here is a condensed version of the story with select quotes from the original article: After acquainting himself with the room he had been assigned, settling into bed, and turning out the lights, Lord Londonderry perceived a light gleaming on the draperies of the lofty canopy over his head. Conscious that there was no fire in the grate—that the curtains were closed—that the chamber had been in perfect darkness but a few moments before, he supposed that some intruder must have accidentally entered his apartment; and, turning hastily round to the side from which the light proceeded— saw—to his infinite astonishment—n...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Dog-Eating Monsters from the Great Dismal Swamp

In the early 1900s, reports of animals - primarily dogs - being killed by an unknown creature around Suffolk and Norfolk were attributed to a nebulous Great Dismal Swamp Monster. The first wave took place in 1902, with stories originating in Suffolk. The Times printed a story that ran one day earlier in the local paper of a strange creature that has been attacking people and dogs around Nansemond in February of 1902: The Strange Monster That Eats Dogs in Nansemond. (Special Dispatch to The Times.) The strange Dismal Swamp monster, which one day this week killed seven of Ed. Smith's dogs, ate two of them, and later attacked Mr. Smith, himself, has been seen again. Mr. Smith lives about twelve miles from Suffolk. Last night L. Frank Ames, a merchant, who lives near Bennett's Creek, saw the same thing and suffered from its ravages. Hearing a strange noise, Mr. Ames went out with a pistol. He thought at first it was a strange dog. When he learned it was the much-sought monster Mr....
Post a Comment
Read more

The Cloaked Creature of Mexico, Missouri

The Wheeling Register seems to be an unending font of strange tales suitable for Halloween. In the December 14, 1883 edition was a reprint of a story that ran one day earlier in Mexico, Mo., about a strange creature roaming the area around Hopewell Church. Exactly what the creature was seemed to be up for debate. At least some people thought it was a ghost, but most of the reports call it a "lean monster man, between eight and ten feet in height, wearing a long cloak, and going about with his head bowed in an abstracted way, but occasionally glaring at those it meets with small, glittering eyes said to resemble those of a cat or some wild beast." A number of sightings happened in the fall of 1883, to the point that farmers were going armed and the school was nearly abandoned in fear. Two separate accounts of seeing the creature were related in the paper, which we will reprint here: John Creary, a well-known old resident, declares that yesterday afternoon [Dec. 12] as he was ...
Post a Comment
Read more