Skip to main content

I Can't Believe It's Oleomargarine!

It's the 1870s. Travel is getting faster, but it's still not instantaneous. Imagine you're on a long boat trip, and you want to have a little snack, but you find your butter has gone rancid. You can't exactly go around to the corner store and pick up a fresh batch. What do you do?

If you're the French navy, the answer was apparently to create artificial butter for your sailors, and incidentally spark a century-long debate on the healthiness and purity of food. Articles that repeated this breakthrough word for word started circulating in Virginia newspapers in the early 1870s, generally reading, as this version in Tri-Weekly News, Volume 7, Number 141, 6 December 1872:

Artificial Butter.— At the request of the [victual] department of the French navy for some wholesome substitute for butter that would keep well, Mege Mouriez [Mège-Mouriès], after a long course of experiments, has succeeded in producing an excellent substitute for genuine butter, that does not become rancid with time, and is otherwise highly recommended. 

As the Wikipedia article notes, the exact chemical reaction was not understood with complete accuracy at the time, but the resultant product was a neutral fat, that when mixed with milk, created a substance similar to butter. This substance was dubbed oleomargarine. The article noted that if the margarine was to be used for something like a sea-voyage where preservation was the utmost priority, the margarine "is melted by a gentle heat in order to eliminate all the water" and extend its shelf-life.

The Churning Room, from Scientific American, April 24, 1880

While the process was patented in France in the 1860s, it seems to have escaped into the wild in 1871. The invention crossed the Atlantic, and stories about this mysterious artificial butter started circulating in the American press for the next year. The invention seems mainly to have been a point of curiosity, as this article in the Virginia Free Press, 7 October 1876 relates:

During the siege of Paris [in 1871], the butter gave out in the great city. A skillful chemist invented a substitute made by a chemical process from the fat of animals, and this substitute, called Oleomargarine, was introduced into the Paris markets. It was not as nice as the genuine article, but the genuine article was not to be had on account of the siege, and many persons, thinking Oleomargarine better than no butter at all, used it extensively, and the manufacturers made money by it. When the siege was raised, however, the people of Paris returned to their Normandy grass butter.

If these kinds of articles were penned in America with an eye toward delegitimizing margarine, it may have partially succeeded. This attitude was likely helped by a concerted effort from dairy farmers to block new competition and paint it as impure or unhealthy. New York and Maryland banned the sale of oleomargarine in 1877, and many other states passed various legislation aimed at regulating the substance in the coming decades. The Federal Oleomargarine Act of 1886 further allowed for examination of butter to ensure it had not been adulterated with margarine.

Even when faced with these additional regulations and taxes, margarine's affordability made it appealing. Advances in manufacturing increased oleomargarine's flavor and texture, and a growing body of scientific evidence supported its safety. Federal rulings eased some restrictions, and margarine became a common grocery store staple. Individual states held onto restrictions long after the Federal regulation has eased, with Wisconsin being the last to lift its ban on colored oleomargarine in 1967. 

The history of margarine has been covered before by many other researchers; you may be interested in Victorian America's Oleomargarine in particular if you like the deep dive into primary resources. For a look at the last holdout, you may enjoy When Margarine Was Contraband at JSTOR Daily.

Enjoy these posts? Support me on Ko-fi.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Valentine Romance

This story appeared in the Charlotte Gazette, Feb. 28, 1895 after being picked up from the New York Ledger (at a time when comic valentines were common but beginning to wane). The author, J.L. Harbour, appears to be a prolific late 19th century to early 20th century writer. By one account , he had written over 600 short stories by 1902. A sketch of his life written the same year states, "He began to send original stories, such as brought to view and tended to correct life's inharmonies, lapses and weaknesses, to eastern journals, and among others to the Youth's Companion , whose editors recognized his gift even in its immaturity."  This short work appears to have been written before he became widely known for "Papa and the Boy" and "The Mourning Veil," but it provides a glimpse of his writing style and sensibilities in humor and character studies. Like many other authors we have investigated here, his work has generally been forgotten by today...

A Peace-Offering, a Valentine Story

This short story, aimed at young readers, appeared in the West Virginia Argus on February 27, 1885 . The credit line attributes this tale to Frances B. Currie, and the story was reprinted from the N. Y. Examiner. She appears to have been a frequent contributor to Frank Leslie's publications , but unlike J. L. Harbour, no biography has been found yet to shed more light on her life and output.  Since this story should also be out of copyright in the US, we have reprinted the entire story for your enjoyment. A PEACE-OFFERING.  A Valentine Story with a Moral, for Young Readers.  Margery Wright was not a beauty. Even the most charitable person in the world could not admit that she had the smallest claim to such a title. The boys in the Delving Seminary said that Margery had a "squat” figure and a “pug" nose. They also alluded to her mouth in a way that brought angry tears into her eyes. They said it opened like a pair of oyster-tongs. These young gentlemen had lived for twelve...

Conrad House Addenda

I was invited to speak at the event unveiling a new historical plaque concerning the Conrad House and the door at the Joint Judicial Center on Friday (part of why the blog has been fairly quiet recently). The presentation will be printed in an upcoming version of the Journal. As usual, I took some questions from the audience at the end of my lecture. That's always a good way to see what I might have overlooked in my first pass through a topic. While I don't know if anyone at the presentation who asked questions will follow up with my blog, here are a few answers to their questions (and others).  Due to the more recent nature of many of the questions and heavy reliance on the Winchester Star, you may need to have your Handley Regional Library card barcode handy and create a free account at newspaperarchive.com to access the full articles linked here. The Property Layout: The property consisted of four lots in total originally: two faced Cameron Street, and two faced Kent Street,...